Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Full text search is unpredictable [bug] #17

Open
processo opened this issue Sep 7, 2015 · 2 comments
Open

Full text search is unpredictable [bug] #17

processo opened this issue Sep 7, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@processo
Copy link

processo commented Sep 7, 2015

I noticed the search only matches full words. (I tried searching piggydb.jp/en for formatting help and formatt (note the double T) did not yield any results, but formatting did.) This way I can only find fragments whose wording I can exactly remember, which is usually not the case.

Edit: I'm not sure what is going on, because format matches information, but not formatting. Now it seems like a bug, not a missing feature.

@processo processo changed the title Partial word search Full text search is unpredictable [bug] Sep 8, 2015
@suewonjp
Copy link

suewonjp commented Oct 1, 2015

I ran into this bug when I was using Piggydb. Actually, I reviewed the source code of Piggydb to try to fix it myself, but eventually I gave it up. That is mostly why I decided to build my own tool of this kind.
( Check out my tool if you have interest - https://github.com/suewonjp/civilizer )

I don't have any purpose of selling my open source project here, but Piggydb has been suspended for a while and looks like the author is busy on another project for a while.

But this kind of tool is necessary for some people and they need support anyway.

I suggest my tool as a possible replacement for those people. That's it.

@pihentagy
Copy link

I also need partial word searching.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants