Biden and Johnson’s ‘New Atlantic Charter’ Has Big Shoes to Fill

In my weekly column for World Politics Review, I look at the aspirations and political appeal of the “revitalized” Atlantic Charter, and how despite historical echoes, the world of 2021 is not the world of 1941.

Last week U.S. President Joe Biden and British Prime Minister Boris Johnson made a bold bid for history’s mantle. Meeting on the eve of the G-7 summit, they released a “revitalized” Atlantic Charter, rededicating their governments to the defense of an open, rule-bound world. Like the original version, drafted by Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill in August 1941, during a secret wartime rendezvous off the coast of Newfoundland, the New Atlantic Charter seeks to rally the West at a time of global crisis. Whether it has a similar, enduring influence is likely to depend more on domestic U.S. political developments than on global geopolitical trends.

The original Atlantic Charter was not a formal treaty—indeed, it was not even signed—but rather a short statement of principles outlining the political and moral foundations for a just, peaceful and prosperous world. The idea for the charter was Roosevelt’s, born of his acute sense of the dire global context that summer. Continental Europe had fallen to Hitler. Japanese militarism was on the march in the Pacific. And much of the world economy had disintegrated into autarkic blocs. At this moment of peril, FDR wanted the United States and Britain to “jointly bind themselves” to the goal of “a new world order based on … principles … that would hold out hope to enslaved peoples of the world.”

Read the full World Politics Review article here.